This page is an extract from BIDS BICC Solution authored by Kamlesh Mhashilkar-Head, Execution-MiH Services of Tata Consultancy Services
Process Compliance
BICC will have defined set of processes for project execution, internal communication, estimation, project funding, etc. To achieve maturity in these processes, process indicators need to be defined, collected and monitored. These indicators can be categorised for Planning, Delivery, System Performance and Monitoring.
Process Indicator Category |
Category Definition |
Planning |
Gives efficiency of project planning process |
Delivery |
Measures correctness of solution implemented |
System Performance |
Measures effectiveness of solution implemented |
Monitoring |
Analyses user satisfaction, ROI, etc |
The following diagram gives examples of few process measures which can be defined by BICC for Process Compliance.

- Planning: To efficiently manage number of associates and project deliveries, effort estimations are a key. Also, for on-time delivery of projects, defining boundaries for each project is a key. Hence, in planning phase of any project, realistic targets should be defined for effort and scope.
- Delivery: Project teams are assumed to be operating in an optimal mode in a BICC. Delivery process measures are defined to record and improvise quality of delivery processes.
- System Performance: For any BI application, refresh windows are critical for decision makers to get information on time. Hence measures like Query Performance and Data Load Window are recorded to ensure process is within boundary conditions.
- Monitoring: All the process measures are to be monitored for any improvisation or change.
The table given below lists roles, which will define above process measures:
| Phase |
Process Measure |
Who Defines? |
Who Reports?
|
Planning |
Estimation Accuracy |
Design Authority |
Delivery Manager |
Scope Control |
Design Authority |
Project Architects |
Release Control |
Design Authority |
ASG Manager |
Delivery |
First Time Right |
Design Authority |
Delivery Manager |
Slippage |
Design Authority |
Delivery Manager |
Defect Density |
Design Authority |
Delivery Manager |
Level1-Level4 Support SLAs |
Design Authority |
ASG Manager |
Ad-hoc/CR SLAs |
Design Authority |
Delivery Manager
ASG Manager |
System Performance |
System Availability |
Business Analyst |
Technical Architect
Design Authority |
Concurrency |
Business Analyst |
Technical Architect
Design Authority |
Query Performance |
Business Analyst |
Technical Architect
Design Authority |
Data Load Window |
Business Analyst |
Technical Architect
Design Authority |
Monitoring |
Cost/Budget |
BICC Director |
Planner |
Defects |
Design Authority |
Delivery Manager |
Business Users Satisfaction Index |
Business Analyst |
Delivery Manager |
Compliance |
BICC Director |
Design Authority |
Note: This is a sample Process Measures list. Elaborate list of process measures shall be defined as part of Strategize phase.
Technology Governance
BICC’s Technology Governance focuses on Infrastructure Management by
- Standardizing technology
- Planning the architecture
- Reviewing Upgrades/Patches
- Technical Troubleshooting
Vendor Management
- Negotiations (first procurement, license augmentation, AMC)
- Escalation procedures
- Licensing
This helps maintaining overall rigor of strategic goals with standardized platform at reduced costs.
Any BI framework consists of multiple components like data-warehouse, ETL, enterprise reporting, etc. To design and develop these components, multiple technologies are packaged together. Let us take an example of an organization having various technologies such as Business Objects, Informatica, J2EE, Oracle, Teradata, MicroStrategy, etc. Each of these technologies can map to one or more of BI components (refer symbol X). Coverage or span of a technology across these components can be tabulated as below and then a decision on consolidation / rationalization can be taken.
BI Tools -> |
BO |
INFA |
MicroStrategy |
Oracle |
Teradata |
BI Components |
Database |
EDW |
|
|
|
|
X |
ADW |
|
|
|
|
X |
DW |
|
|
|
|
X |
ODS |
|
|
|
X |
|
DM |
|
|
|
|
X |
ETL |
DQM |
|
X |
|
|
|
ETL |
|
X |
|
|
|
ELT |
|
X |
|
|
|
EII |
|
|
|
|
|
EAI |
|
X |
|
|
|
CDC/RT |
|
X |
|
|
|
Reporting |
OLAP |
X |
|
|
|
|
Enterprise |
X |
|
X |
|
|
In a rapidly growing environment, in absence of strategic body for managing deployment architectures for multiple products and procurement of licenses, overall architecture can become random and may lead to added maintenance costs. A BICC can help standardizing technology stack by identifying coverage of a technology, measuring popularity and capability of technology. This analysis can be done by using ISO 9126 quality characteristics.
Data Governance
Data Governance is a very large framework which builds an organization-wide ability to precisely define, easily integrate, and effectively retrieve data for both internal applications and external communication. It needs the following six components in place.
Note- BIDS Solutions encompass the proprietary solutions from TCS covering Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing landscape.
|